↓ Skip to main content

The relationship between adolescents’ well-being and their wireless phone use: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
13 X users
facebook
18 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The relationship between adolescents’ well-being and their wireless phone use: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Environmental Health, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-12-90
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Redmayne, Euan Smith, Michael J Abramson

Abstract

The exposure of young people to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) has increased rapidly in recent years with their increased use of cellphones and use of cordless phones and WiFi. We sought to ascertain associations between New Zealand early-adolescents' subjective well-being and self-reported use of, or exposure to, wireless telephone and internet technology.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 171 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Researcher 13 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 5%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 48 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Psychology 10 6%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Environmental Science 8 5%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 63 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,827,032
of 26,705,860 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#365
of 1,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,895
of 227,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,705,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.