↓ Skip to main content

Biomarkers of Osteosarcoma, Chondrosarcoma, and Ewing Sarcoma

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomarkers of Osteosarcoma, Chondrosarcoma, and Ewing Sarcoma
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2017.00150
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco R Evola, Luciano Costarella, Vito Pavone, Giuseppe Caff, Luca Cannavò, Andrea Sessa, Sergio Avondo, Giuseppe Sessa

Abstract

Osteosarcoma is the most frequent malignant bone neoplasm, followed by chondrosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. The diagnosis of bone neoplasms is generally made through histological evaluation of a biopsy. Clinical and radiological features are also important in aiding diagnosis and to complete the staging of bone cancer. In addition to these, there are several non-specific serological or specific molecular markers for bone neoplasms. In bone tumors, molecular markers increase the accuracy of the diagnosis and assist in subtyping bone tumors. Here, we review these markers and discuss their role in the diagnosis and prognosis of the three most frequent malignant bone neoplasms, namely osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and Ewing sarcoma.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 14%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Other 12 9%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 36 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 39 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,929,731
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#5,254
of 16,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,644
of 309,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#73
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.