↓ Skip to main content

(Non-)translational medicine: targeting bacterial RNA

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
(Non-)translational medicine: targeting bacterial RNA
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2013.00230
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam M. Dinan, Brendan J. Loftus

Abstract

The rise and spread of antibiotic resistance is among the most severe challenges facing modern medicine. Despite this fact, attempts to develop novel classes of antibiotic have been largely unsuccessful. The traditional mechanisms by which antibiotics work are subject to relatively rapid bacterial resistance via mutation, and hence have a limited period of efficacy. One promising strategy to ameliorate this problem is to shift from the use of chemical compounds targeting protein structures and processes to a new era of RNA-based therapeutics. RNA-mediated regulation (riboregulation) has evolved naturally in bacteria and is therefore a highly efficient means by which gene expression can be manipulated. Here, we describe recent advances toward the development of effective anti-bacterial therapies, which operate through various strategies centered on RNA.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 12 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 8%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2013.
All research outputs
#6,542,165
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,996
of 12,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,591
of 283,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#83
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,336 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.