↓ Skip to main content

抗腫瘍性抗生物質ザルコマイシンの著効を奏した1例

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese journal of antibiotics, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 134)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
抗腫瘍性抗生物質ザルコマイシンの著効を奏した1例
Published in
Japanese journal of antibiotics, May 2013
DOI 10.11554/antibiotics1953b.8.61
Authors

鈴木 辰四郎, 堀内 博

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,145,365
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese journal of antibiotics
#12
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,999
of 209,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese journal of antibiotics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.