↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing Immunostaining of Enamel Matrix: Application of Sudan Black B and Minimization of False Positives from Normal Sera and IgGs

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimizing Immunostaining of Enamel Matrix: Application of Sudan Black B and Minimization of False Positives from Normal Sera and IgGs
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2017.00239
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xu Yang, Alexander J. Vidunas, Elia Beniash

Abstract

Non-specific fluorescence from demineralized enamel matrix can significantly compromise the immunofluorescence studies and lead to false positives. Our goal was to assess degrees of non-specific binding under different conditions and try to optimize procedures for immunofluorescence studies of forming enamel. Firstly, we compared two methods for background fluorescence elimination, i.e., sodium borohydride and Sudan Black B treatments. The results demonstrated that Sudan Black B is far superior to sodium borohydride in reducing the background fluorescence in dental tissues. We also studied the extent of non-specific binding of normal sera and purified polyclonal immunoglobulins (IgG) from five mammalian species, guinea pig, rat, rabbit, goat, and sheep, over a broad range of dilutions. For all sera tested fluorescence signals increased exponentially from 1:1000 to 1:100. Interestingly, the non-specific binding of sera from rodent species was below that of positive control in the whole range of dilutions. In contrast, incubation with sera from 3 non-rodent species produced much higher signals which surpassed the positive control signal at 1:250~1:500 dilution range. Most of the IgGs didn't show significant non-specific binding within 0.25-5 μg/ml range, except rabbit IgG which demonstrated extremely high affinity to the enamel matrix even at concentrations as low as 1 μg/ml. Further, studies confirmed that Fab fragments of purified normal rabbit IgG, not conserved Fc fragments, were involved in the interactions. Our observations suggest this high affinity is associated with the antigen binding sites of rabbit IgG. We anticipate that our results will help enamel researchers to optimize and standardize their immunochemical procedures.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2017.
All research outputs
#18,810,584
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#8,399
of 14,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,149
of 310,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#151
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.