Title |
Pulmonary Delivery of Virosome-Bound Antigen Enhances Antigen-Specific CD4+ T Cell Proliferation Compared to Liposome-Bound or Soluble Antigen
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00359 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rebecca A. M. Blom, Mario Amacker, R. Maarten van Dijk, Christian Moser, Philip A. Stumbles, Fabian Blank, Christophe von Garnier |
Abstract |
Pulmonary administration of biomimetic nanoparticles loaded with antigen may represent an effective strategy to directly modulate adaptive immune responses in the respiratory tract. Depending on the design, virosomes may not only serve as biomimetic antigen carriers but are also endowed with intrinsic immune-stimulatory properties. We designed fluorescently labeled influenza-derived virosomes and liposome controls coupled to the model antigen ovalbumin to investigate uptake, phenotype changes, and antigen processing by antigen-presenting cells exposed to such particles in different respiratory tract compartments. Both virosomes and liposomes were captured by pulmonary macrophages and dendritic cells alike and induced activation in particle-bearing cells by upregulation of costimulatory markers such as CD40, CD80, CD86, PD-L1, PD-L2, and ICOS-L. Though antigen processing and accumulation of both coupled and soluble antigen was similar between virosomes and liposomes, only ovalbumin-coupled virosomes generated a strong antigen-specific CD4(+) T cell proliferation. Pulmonary administrated antigen-coupled virosomes therefore effectively induced adaptive immune responses and may be utilized in novel preventive or therapeutic approaches in the respiratory tract. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 29% |
Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
Student > Master | 6 | 16% |
Researcher | 6 | 16% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 11% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 32% |