The Reliability and Validity of a Four-Minute Running Time-Trial in Assessing V˙O2max and Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, May 2017

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

So far, Altmetric has seen 10 X posts from 9 X users, with an upper bound of 21,285 followers.

@Torben_02 @cwmagee @DrMarkBurnley Although not according to what I observed (table 2, figure 1), where verification VO2 was sig lower: https://t.co/yrzpow6jct

@musgraveandrew 1/2 Hmm, performance time is a notoriously unreliable parameter when it comes to TTE tests, while VO2max isn't. https://t.co/KCRdSsh8oE

The Reliability and (in)Validity of a 4-min Running Time-Trial in Assessing VO2max and Performance https://t.co/2mXQjTrxHN

The Reliability and Validity of a Four-Minute Running Time-Trial in Assessing V˙O2max and Performance https://t.co/xpjPqvT2cr

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 6 additional X posts.