Title |
Minimally invasive endoscopic resection for the treatment of sinonasal malignancy: the outcomes and risk factors for recurrence
|
---|---|
Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, May 2017
|
DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s131185 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ning He, Xiaohong Chen, Luo Zhang, Xuejun Chen, Zhigang Huang, Qi Zhong, Hongzhi Ma, Ling Feng, Lizhen Hou, Jugao Fang |
Abstract |
The role of minimally invasive endoscopic resection (MIER) in the treatment of sinonasal malignancy is controversial. Herein, we performed a retrospective review of a large case series of sinonasal malignancy patients treated with MIER aimed at evaluating the outcomes and identifying the risk factors for recurrence. Patients with sinonasal malignancy who underwent MIER from March 2000 to May 2015 were enrolled, and their clinical data were collected. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by determining the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The predictive factors for survival and potential independent risk factors for recurrence were explored. A total of 120 patients were enrolled, including 62 males and 58 females. The mean follow-up period was 51.4 (95% confidence interval: 44.0-59.1) months. The most frequent histological type was mucosal malignant melanoma. The positive margin rate was 19.2% (23/120). Seventy-one patients had the safety anatomic plane (SAP). Age ≥50 years, nodal metastasis, and not having the SAP were found to be predictive factors for survival, and absence of SAP was found to be an independent risk factor for recurrence. Our study indicated that MIER is an effective and safe surgical procedure in appropriately selected patients. Tumor resection with a safety anatomic boundary is likely to lead to improved survival and decreased recurrence. However, a larger sample and long-term prospective observation are still required to establish the role of MIER in treatment of sinonasal malignancy. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 23% |
Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 46% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
Psychology | 1 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |