The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Petrologic, tectonic, and metallogenic evolution of the southern segment of the ancestral Cascades magmatic arc, California and Nevada
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geosphere, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1130/ges00944.1 |
Authors |
Edward A. du Bray, David A. John, Brian L. Cousens |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 27 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 23% |
Researcher | 5 | 17% |
Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 28 | 93% |
Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2013.
All research outputs
#3,772,949
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Geosphere
#471
of 765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,050
of 307,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geosphere
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.