↓ Skip to main content

The neural encoding of self-generated and externally applied movement: implications for the perception of self-motion and spatial memory

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The neural encoding of self-generated and externally applied movement: implications for the perception of self-motion and spatial memory
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2013.00108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathleen E Cullen

Abstract

The vestibular system is vital for maintaining an accurate representation of self-motion. As one moves (or is moved) toward a new place in the environment, signals from the vestibular sensors are relayed to higher-order centers. It is generally assumed the vestibular system provides a veridical representation of head motion to these centers for the perception of self-motion and spatial memory. In support of this idea, evidence from lesion studies suggests that vestibular inputs are required for the directional tuning of head direction cells in the limbic system as well as neurons in areas of multimodal association cortex. However, recent investigations in monkeys and mice challenge the notion that early vestibular pathways encode an absolute representation of head motion. Instead, processing at the first central stage is inherently multimodal. This minireview highlights recent progress that has been made towards understanding how the brain processes and interprets self-motion signals encoded by the vestibular otoliths and semicircular canals during everyday life. The following interrelated questions are considered. What information is available to the higher-order centers that contribute to self-motion perception? How do we distinguish between our own self-generated movements and those of the external world? And lastly, what are the implications of differences in the processing of these active vs. passive movements for spatial memory?

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
France 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 120 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 28%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Professor 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 34 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 16%
Psychology 13 10%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2014.
All research outputs
#18,359,382
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#690
of 853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,330
of 305,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#16
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.