↓ Skip to main content

Signatures of Human NK Cell Development and Terminal Differentiation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Signatures of Human NK Cell Development and Terminal Differentiation
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00499
Pubmed ID
Authors

Merlin Luetke-Eversloh, Monica Killig, Chiara Romagnani

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells are part of the innate lymphoid cell (ILC) family and represent the main cytotoxic population. NK cells develop from bone marrow common lymphoid progenitors and undergo terminal differentiation in the periphery, where they finally gain their cytotoxic competence as well as the ability to produce IFN-γ in response to engagement of activating receptors. This process has been at least partially elucidated and several markers have been identified to discriminate different NK cell stages and other ILC populations. NK cell terminal differentiation is not only associated with progressive phenotypic changes but also with defined effector signatures. In this essay, we will describe the phenotypic and functional characteristics of the main stages of NK cell development and terminal differentiation and discuss them in light of recent discoveries of novel ILC populations.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Montenegro 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 148 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 23%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 29 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 32 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 12%
Sports and Recreations 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 30 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#24,741
of 31,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,815
of 288,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#318
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.