↓ Skip to main content

Efflux pumps of Gram-negative bacteria: what they do, how they do it, with what and how to deal with them

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
412 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efflux pumps of Gram-negative bacteria: what they do, how they do it, with what and how to deal with them
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2013.00168
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonard Amaral, Ana Martins, Gabriella Spengler, Joseph Molnar

Abstract

This review discusses the relationship of the efflux pump (EP) system of Gram-negative bacteria to other antibiotic resistance mechanisms of the bacterium such as quorum sensing, biofilms, two component regulons, etc. The genetic responses of a Gram-negative to an antibiotic that render it immune to an antibiotic are also discussed. Lastly, the methods that have been developed for the identification of bacteria that over-express their EP system are presented in detail. Phenothiazines are well-known antipsychotic drugs with reported activity against bacterial EPs and other ancillary antibiotic mechanisms of the organism. Therefore these compounds will also be discussed.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 412 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 406 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 22%
Student > Master 58 14%
Student > Bachelor 53 13%
Researcher 39 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 3%
Other 43 10%
Unknown 113 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 34 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 32 8%
Chemistry 29 7%
Other 48 12%
Unknown 125 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#675,971
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#218
of 16,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,689
of 307,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.