↓ Skip to main content

Root exudation and root development of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Tizian) as affected by different soils

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Root exudation and root development of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Tizian) as affected by different soils
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00002
Pubmed ID
Authors

G Neumann, S Bott, M A Ohler, H-P Mock, R Lippmann, R Grosch, K Smalla

Abstract

Development and activity of plant roots exhibit high adaptive variability. Although it is well-documented, that physicochemical soil properties can strongly influence root morphology and root exudation, particularly under field conditions, a comparative assessment is complicated by the impact of additional factors, such as climate and cropping history. To overcome these limitations, in this study, field soils originating from an unique experimental plot system with three different soil types, which were stored at the same field site for 10 years and exposed to the same agricultural management practice, were used for an investigation on effects of soil type on root development and root exudation. Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Tizian) was grown as a model plant under controlled environmental conditions in a minirhizotrone system equipped with root observation windows (rhizoboxes). Root exudates were collected by placing sorption filters onto the root surface followed by subsequent extraction and GC-MS profiling of the trapped compounds. Surprisingly, even in absence of external stress factors with known impact on root exudation, such as pH extremes, water and nutrient limitations/toxicities or soil structure effects (use of sieved soils), root growth characteristics (root length, fine root development) as well as profiles of root exudates were strongly influenced by the soil type used for plant cultivation. The results coincided well with differences in rhizosphere bacterial communities, detected in field-grown lettuce plants cultivated on the same soils (Schreiter et al., this issue). The findings suggest that the observed differences may be the result of plant interactions with the soil-specific microbiomes.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 278 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 28%
Student > Master 48 17%
Researcher 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 44 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126 44%
Environmental Science 35 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 7%
Chemistry 8 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 3%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 67 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,217,843
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#22,196
of 24,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,742
of 305,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#64
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.