↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of Lipopeptide Biosurfactants Produced by Bacillus licheniformis MB01 from Marine Sediments

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of Lipopeptide Biosurfactants Produced by Bacillus licheniformis MB01 from Marine Sediments
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00871
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yulin Chen, Shiliang A. Liu, Haijin Mou, Yunxiao Ma, Meng Li, Xiaoke Hu

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance has become one of the world's most severe problems because of the overuse of antibiotics. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria are more difficult to kill and more expensive to treat. Researchers have been studied on antibiotic alternatives such as antimicrobial peptides and lipopeptides. A functional bacteria MB01 producing lipopeptides which can be used as bacteriostat was isolated from the Bohai Sea sediments, which had been identified as Bacillus licheniformis by the morphological, physiological, and biochemical identification and 16s rDNA sequence. The lipopeptides produced by MB01 were determined to be cyclic surfactin homologs by LC-ESI-MS structural identification after crude extraction and LH-20 chromatography. [M+H](+)m/z 994, 1008, 1022, and 1036 were all the characteristic molecular weight of surfactin homologs. CID analysis revealed that the molecular structure of the lipopeptides was Rn-Glu(1)-Leu/Ile(2)-Leu(3)-Val(4)-Asp(5)-Leu(6)-Leu/Ile(7). The lipopeptides showed well resistance to UV light and the change of pH and temperature.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 22%
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 36 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 9%
Chemical Engineering 8 6%
Environmental Science 8 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 37 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,425,762
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#22,626
of 25,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,396
of 310,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#468
of 537 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 537 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.