↓ Skip to main content

Unmixing of fluorescence spectra to resolve quantitative time-series measurements of gene expression in plate readers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unmixing of fluorescence spectra to resolve quantitative time-series measurements of gene expression in plate readers
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6750-14-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine A Lichten, Rachel White, Ivan BN Clark, Peter S Swain

Abstract

To connect gene expression with cellular physiology, we need to follow levels of proteins over time. Experiments typically use variants of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP), and time-series measurements require specialist expertise if single cells are to be followed. Fluorescence plate readers, however, a standard in many laboratories, can in principle provide similar data, albeit at a mean, population level. Nevertheless, extracting the average fluorescence per cell is challenging because autofluorescence can be substantial.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 32%
Student > Master 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 28%
Chemistry 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,363,356
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#763
of 935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,659
of 307,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.