↓ Skip to main content

Functional Diversity of AAA+ Protease Complexes in Bacillus subtilis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 X users

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional Diversity of AAA+ Protease Complexes in Bacillus subtilis
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2017.00044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander K. W. Elsholz, Marlene S. Birk, Emmanuelle Charpentier, Kürşad Turgay

Abstract

Here, we review the diverse roles and functions of AAA+ protease complexes in protein homeostasis, control of stress response and cellular development pathways by regulatory and general proteolysis in the Gram-positive model organism Bacillus subtilis. We discuss in detail the intricate involvement of AAA+ protein complexes in controlling sporulation, the heat shock response and the role of adaptor proteins in these processes. The investigation of these protein complexes and their adaptor proteins has revealed their relevance for Gram-positive pathogens and their potential as targets for new antibiotics.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 26%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 7%
Chemistry 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,728,282
of 26,717,531 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#84
of 4,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,285
of 330,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,717,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,866 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.