↓ Skip to main content

The mechanisms and treatment of asphyxial encephalopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The mechanisms and treatment of asphyxial encephalopathy
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2014.00040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guido Wassink, Eleanor R. Gunn, Paul P. Drury, Laura Bennet, Alistair J. Gunn

Abstract

Acute post-asphyxial encephalopathy occurring around the time of birth remains a major cause of death and disability. The recent seminal insight that allows active neuroprotective treatment is that even after profound asphyxia (the "primary" phase), many brain cells show initial recovery from the insult during a short "latent" phase, typically lasting approximately 6 h, only to die hours to days later after a "secondary" deterioration characterized by seizures, cytotoxic edema, and progressive failure of cerebral oxidative metabolism. Although many of these secondary processes are potentially injurious, they appear to be primarily epiphenomena of the "execution" phase of cell death. Animal and human studies designed around this conceptual framework have shown that moderate cerebral hypothermia initiated as early as possible but before the onset of secondary deterioration, and continued for a sufficient duration to allow the secondary deterioration to resolve, has been associated with potent, long-lasting neuroprotection. Recent clinical trials show that while therapeutic hypothermia significantly reduces morbidity and mortality, many babies still die or survive with disabilities. The challenge for the future is to find ways of improving the effectiveness of treatment. In this review, we will dissect the known mechanisms of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in relation to the known effects of hypothermic neuroprotection.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 244 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 36 15%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Student > Postgraduate 20 8%
Other 43 17%
Unknown 55 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 39%
Neuroscience 28 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 67 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#10,137
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,467
of 319,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#43
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.