↓ Skip to main content

From Genes to Health – Challenges and Opportunities

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From Genes to Health – Challenges and Opportunities
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fped.2014.00012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Ramzan Manwar Hussain, Asifullah Khan, Hussein Sheikh Ali Mohamoud

Abstract

In genome science, the advancement in high-throughput sequencing technologies and bioinformatics analysis is facilitating the better understanding of Mendelian and complex trait inheritance. Charting the genetic basis of complex diseases - including pediatric cancer, and interpreting huge amount of next-generation sequencing data are among the major technical challenges to be overcome in order to understand the molecular basis of various diseases and genetic disorders. In this review, we provide insights into some major challenges currently hindering a better understanding of Mendelian and complex trait inheritance, and thus impeding medical benefits to patients.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 15%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Researcher 3 23%
Other 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 31%
Computer Science 3 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2014.
All research outputs
#13,171,251
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,615
of 5,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,429
of 305,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.