↓ Skip to main content

The Influence of Rest Period Instructions on the Default Mode Network

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Influence of Rest Period Instructions on the Default Mode Network
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Benjamin, Daniel A. Lieberman, Maria Chang, Noa Ofen, Sue Whitfield-Gabrieli, John D. E. Gabrieli, Nadine Gaab

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
Germany 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 154 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 22%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Professor 13 8%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 19 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 35%
Neuroscience 23 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 11%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 32 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2011.
All research outputs
#4,649,037
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,095
of 7,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,782
of 164,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#24
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.