↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating plantar heel pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating plantar heel pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000416.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fay Crawford, Colin E Thomson

Abstract

Ten percent of people may experience pain under the heel (plantar heel pain) at some time. Injections, insoles, heel pads, strapping and surgery have been common forms of treatment offered. The absolute and relative effectiveness of these interventions are poorly understood.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 146 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Other 13 9%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 43 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 57 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,045,324
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,640
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,573
of 178,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.