The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Continued Vigilance – Development of an Online Evaluation Tool for Assessing Preparedness of Medical Facilities for Biological Events
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00035 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bruria Adini, Luzie Verbeek, Susanna Trapp, Stefan Schilling, Julia Sasse, Kathrin Pientka, Boris Böddinghaus, Helene Schaefer, Jörg Schempf, Reinhard Brodt, Christian Wegner, Boaz Lev, Daniel Laor, Rene Gottschalk, Walter Biederbick |
Abstract |
Effective response to biological events necessitates ongoing evaluation of preparedness. This study was a bilateral German-Israeli collaboration aimed at developing an evaluation tool for assessing preparedness of medical facilities for biological events. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Grenada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
Lecturer | 4 | 13% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 6 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
Engineering | 3 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2014.
All research outputs
#23,595,406
of 26,267,662 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#10,484
of 14,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,060
of 241,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#34
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,267,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.