The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rhabdomyolysis due to water intoxication
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine, January 2005
|
DOI | 10.3918/jsicm.12.219 |
Authors |
Shoko Kogawa, Akitsuki Morikawa, Mineji Hayakawa, Jun Sawamura, Naoyuki Matsuda, Takehiko Ishikawa, Takashi Kameue, Satoshi Gando |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2016.
All research outputs
#8,134,197
of 24,396,012 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine
#37
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,181
of 146,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,396,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.