↓ Skip to main content

Microglial diversity by responses and responders

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microglial diversity by responses and responders
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2014.00101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulla Gertig, Uwe-Karsten Hanisch

Abstract

Microglia are the principal resident innate immune cells of the CNS. Their contributions to the normal development of the CNS, the maintenance and plasticity of neuronal networks and the safeguarding of proper functionality are becoming more and more evident. Microglia also survey the tissue homeostasis to respond rapidly to exogenous and endogenous threats, primarily with a protective outcome. However, excessive acute activation, chronic activity or an improper adaptation of their functional performance can foster neuropathologies. A key to the versatile response behavior of these cells is their ability to commit to reactive phenotypes, which reveal enormous complexity. Yet the respective profiles of induced genes and installed functions may build up on heterogeneous contributions of cellular subsets. Here, we discuss findings and concepts that consider the variety of microglial activities and response options as being based-at least in part-on a diversity of the engaged cells. Whether it is the production of proinflammatory cytokines, clearance of tissue debris, antigen presentation or the ability to sense neurotransmitters, microglial cells present with an unanticipated heterogeneity of their constitutive and inducible features. While the organizational principles of this heterogeneity are still largely unknown, functional implications are already perceptible.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Serbia 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 162 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 22%
Student > Bachelor 28 16%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 24 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 27%
Neuroscience 43 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 27 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2014.
All research outputs
#18,371,293
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#3,237
of 4,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,696
of 226,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#30
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.