↓ Skip to main content

The Potential Role of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Image-Guided Radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Potential Role of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Image-Guided Radiotherapy
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2014.00091
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mai Lin Nguyen, Brooke Willows, Rihan Khan, Alexander Chi, Lyndon Kim, Sherif G. Nour, Thomas Sroka, Christine Kerr, Juan Godinez, Melissa Mills, Ulf Karlsson, Gabor Altdorfer, Nam Phong Nguyen, Gordon Jendrasiak, The International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group

Abstract

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a non-invasive technique to detect metabolites within the normal and tumoral tissues. The ability of MRS to diagnose areas of high metabolic activity linked to tumor cell proliferation is particularly useful for radiotherapy treatment planning because of better gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation. The GTV may be targeted with higher radiation dose, potentially improving local control without excessive irradiation to the normal adjacent tissues. Prostate cancer and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are two tumor models that are associated with a heterogeneous tumor distribution. Preliminary studies suggest that the integration of MRS into radiotherapy planning for these tumors is feasible and safe. Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) by virtue of daily tumor imaging and steep dose gradient may allow for tumor dose escalation with the simultaneous integrated boost technique (SIB) and potentially decrease the complications rates in patients with GBM and prostate cancers.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 13 27%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 37%
Physics and Astronomy 7 14%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Computer Science 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2014.
All research outputs
#6,644,452
of 26,414,132 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#2,168
of 23,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,152
of 242,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#13
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,414,132 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.