↓ Skip to main content

Regulatory T Cells Diminish HIV Infection in Dendritic Cells – Conventional CD4+ T Cell Clusters

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulatory T Cells Diminish HIV Infection in Dendritic Cells – Conventional CD4+ T Cell Clusters
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00199
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria E. Moreno-Fernandez, Jara J. Joedicke, Claire A. Chougnet

Abstract

Formation of immunological synapses (IS) between dendritic cells (DCs) and conventional CD4(+) T cells (Tcon) is critical for productive immune responses. However, when DCs are HIV-infected such synapses are critical to establish HIV infection. As regulatory T cells (Treg) control DC-Tcon interactions, we inquired whether Treg might interfere with DC to Tcon HIV infection. We developed a model, using monocyte-derived DC infected with R5-HIV, and cultured with Tcon in the presence or absence of autologous Treg, using the physiological ratio of 1 Treg for 10 Tcon. Cultures containing Treg significantly decreased HIV infection in DC:T cell clusters. Notably, Treg appear to have an effect on the quality of the IS, as Treg decreased actin polymerization and DC maturation. Importantly, Treg decreased the trafficking of HIV punctate to the IS. Further, CD152 and cyclic adenosine monophosphate were critical Treg effector molecules, as their individual or simultaneous blockade abolished Treg activity, however no additive effect was found. Together, these data suggest that Treg can reduce HIV dissemination, which may be beneficial to the host in the early stages of infection.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 28%
Student > Bachelor 5 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 48%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 24%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2014.
All research outputs
#16,568,023
of 26,587,745 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#16,305
of 33,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,194
of 243,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#55
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,587,745 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.