The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Myocardial fibrosis in Eisenmenger syndrome: a descriptive cohort study exploring associations of late gadolinium enhancement with clinical status and survival
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-16-32 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Craig S Broberg, Sanjay K Prasad, Chad Carr, Sonya V Babu-Narayan, Konstantinos Dimopoulos, Michael A Gatzoulis |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
Researcher | 4 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 15% |
Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 55% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,655,805
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#956
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,228
of 243,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.