The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Topical agents and dressings for fungating wounds
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003948.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Una J Adderley, Ian GS Holt |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 315 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 51 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 36 | 11% |
Other | 25 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 8% |
Other | 56 | 18% |
Unknown | 99 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 19% |
Psychology | 10 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
Other | 29 | 9% |
Unknown | 104 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,639,632
of 26,205,030 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,121
of 13,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,430
of 242,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#148
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,205,030 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.