Title |
What future research should bring to help resolving the debate about the efficacy of EEG-neurofeedback in children with ADHD
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00321 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Madelon A. Vollebregt, Martine van Dongen-Boomsma, Dorine Slaats-Willemse, Jan K. Buitelaar |
Abstract |
In recent years a rising amount of randomized controlled trials, reviews, and meta-analyses relating to the efficacy of electroencephalographic-neurofeedback (EEG-NF) in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have been published. Although clinical reports and open treatment studies suggest EEG-NF to be effective, double blind placebo-controlled studies as well as a rigorous meta-analysis failed to find support for the efficacy of EEG-NF. Since absence of evidence does not equate with evidence of absence, we will outline how future research might overcome the present methodological limitations. To provide conclusive evidence for the presence or absence of the efficacy of EEG-NF in the treatment of ADHD, there is a need to set up a well-designed study that ensures optimal implementation and embedding of the training, and possibly incorporates different forms of neurofeedback. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Russia | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 134 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 35 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 20% |
Researcher | 23 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 13% |
Unknown | 14 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 51 | 36% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 16% |
Neuroscience | 12 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
Computer Science | 6 | 4% |
Other | 22 | 16% |
Unknown | 20 | 14% |