↓ Skip to main content

Interactions of the cell-wall glycopolymers of lactic acid bacteria with their bacteriophages

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interactions of the cell-wall glycopolymers of lactic acid bacteria with their bacteriophages
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00236
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie-Pierre Chapot-Chartier

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are Gram positive bacteria widely used in the production of fermented food in particular cheese and yoghurts. Bacteriophage infections during fermentation processes have been for many years a major industrial concern and have stimulated numerous research efforts. Better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of bacteriophage interactions with their host bacteria is required for the development of efficient strategies to fight against infections. The bacterial cell wall plays key roles in these interactions. First, bacteriophages must adsorb at the bacterial surface through specific interactions with receptors that are cell wall components. At next step, phages must overcome the barrier constituted by cell wall peptidoglycan (PG) to inject DNA inside bacterial cell. Also at the end of the infection cycle, phages synthesize endolysins able to hydrolyze PG and lyse bacterial cells to release phage progeny. In the last decade, concomitant development of genomics and structural analysis of cell wall components allowed considerable advances in the knowledge of their structure and function in several model LAB. Here, we describe the present knowledge on the structure of the cell wall glycopolymers of the best characterized LAB emphasizing their structural variations and we present the available data regarding their role in bacteria-phage specific interactions at the different steps of the infection cycle.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 112 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 14%
Chemistry 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,372,841
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19,151
of 24,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,985
of 226,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#137
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.