↓ Skip to main content

Do we measure gray matter activation with functional diffusion tensor imaging?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do we measure gray matter activation with functional diffusion tensor imaging?
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2014.00126
Pubmed ID
Authors

René C. W. Mandl, Hugo G. Schnack, Marcel P. Zwiers, René S. Kahn, Hilleke E. Hulshoff Pol

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 37%
Student > Master 3 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Professor 2 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 26%
Psychology 3 16%
Neuroscience 3 16%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2014.
All research outputs
#16,580,157
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#7,358
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,079
of 241,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#64
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.