↓ Skip to main content

Improving fold resistance prediction of HIV-1 against protease and reverse transcriptase inhibitors using artificial neural networks

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving fold resistance prediction of HIV-1 against protease and reverse transcriptase inhibitors using artificial neural networks
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12859-017-1782-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivier Sheik Amamuddy, Nigel T. Bishop, Özlem Tastan Bishop

Abstract

Drug resistance in HIV treatment is still a worldwide problem. Predicting resistance to antiretrovirals (ARVs) before starting any treatment is important. Prediction accuracy is essential, as low-accuracy predictions increase the risk of prescribing sub-optimal drug regimens leading to patients developing resistance sooner. Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are a powerful tool that would be able to assist in drug resistance prediction. In this study, we constrained the dataset to subtype B, sacrificing generalizability for a higher predictive performance, and demonstrated that the predictive quality of the ANN regression models have definite improvement for most ARVs. Trained regression ANNs were optimized for eight protease inhibitors, six nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors and four non-nucleoside RT inhibitors by experimenting combinations of rare variant filtering (none versus 1 residue occurrence) and ANN topologies (1-3 hidden layers with 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 nodes per layer). Single hidden layers (5-20 nodes) were used for training where overfitting was detected. 5-fold cross-validation produced mean R(2) values over 0.95 and standard deviations lower than 0.04 for all but two antiretrovirals. Overall, higher accuracies and lower variances (compared to results published in 2016) were obtained by experimenting with various preprocessing methods, while focusing on the most prevalent subtype in the raw dataset (subtype B).We thus highlight the need to develop and make available subtype-specific datasets for developing higher accuracy in drug-resistance prediction methods.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 13 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,824,517
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,460
of 7,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,331
of 316,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#13
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.