↓ Skip to main content

Celestine-Bearing Geodes from Wayne and Emery Counties, Southeastern Utah: Genesis and Mineralogy

Overview of attention for article published in Rocks & Minerals, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 152)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Celestine-Bearing Geodes from Wayne and Emery Counties, Southeastern Utah: Genesis and Mineralogy
Published in
Rocks & Minerals, June 2015
DOI 10.1080/00357529.2015.1034489
Authors

Daniel E. Kile, Richard D. Dayvault, William C. Hood, H. Steven Hatch

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,875,193
of 26,203,160 outputs
Outputs from Rocks & Minerals
#17
of 152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,666
of 278,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rocks & Minerals
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,203,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them