↓ Skip to main content

Hydrodynamic alignment and assembly of nanofibrils resulting in strong cellulose filaments

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
11 X users
patent
2 patents
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
437 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
469 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydrodynamic alignment and assembly of nanofibrils resulting in strong cellulose filaments
Published in
Nature Communications, June 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms5018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karl M. O. Håkansson, Andreas B. Fall, Fredrik Lundell, Shun Yu, Christina Krywka, Stephan V. Roth, Gonzalo Santoro, Mathias Kvick, Lisa Prahl Wittberg, Lars Wågberg, L. Daniel Söderberg

Abstract

Cellulose nanofibrils can be obtained from trees and have considerable potential as a building block for biobased materials. In order to achieve good properties of these materials, the nanostructure must be controlled. Here we present a process combining hydrodynamic alignment with a dispersion-gel transition that produces homogeneous and smooth filaments from a low-concentration dispersion of cellulose nanofibrils in water. The preferential fibril orientation along the filament direction can be controlled by the process parameters. The specific ultimate strength is considerably higher than previously reported filaments made of cellulose nanofibrils. The strength is even in line with the strongest cellulose pulp fibres extracted from wood with the same degree of fibril alignment. Successful nanoscale alignment before gelation demands a proper separation of the timescales involved. Somewhat surprisingly, the device must not be too small if this is to be achieved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 469 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 455 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 108 23%
Researcher 91 19%
Student > Master 61 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 6%
Student > Bachelor 20 4%
Other 60 13%
Unknown 100 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 90 19%
Engineering 79 17%
Chemistry 73 16%
Chemical Engineering 19 4%
Physics and Astronomy 18 4%
Other 53 11%
Unknown 137 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#369,174
of 26,381,140 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#5,760
of 61,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,961
of 242,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#41
of 661 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,381,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 661 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.