↓ Skip to main content

Risk Factors for Intensive Care Unit Admission in Patients with Autoimmune Encephalitis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk Factors for Intensive Care Unit Admission in Patients with Autoimmune Encephalitis
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00835
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gayane Harutyunyan, Larissa Hauer, Martin W. Dünser, Tobias Moser, Slaven Pikija, Markus Leitinger, Helmut F. Novak, Wolfgang Aichhorn, Eugen Trinka, Johann Sellner

Abstract

Prevention and early recognition of critical illness in patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is essential to achieve better outcome. To evaluate risk factors for intensive care unit (ICU) admission and its prognostic impact in patients with AE. A reclassification of patients hospitalized between 2011 and 2016 revealed 17 "definite" and 15 "probable" AE cases. Thirteen patients (41%) developed critical illness and required ICU admission. The underlying conditions were intractable seizures or status epilepticus (54%), altered mental state (39%), and respiratory failure (8%). ICU admission was associated with longer time from first symptoms to hospitalization (p = 0.046). Regression analysis revealed that anemia on hospital admission and definite diagnosis of AE was associated with a higher risk of acquiring critical illness. At last follow-up after a median of 31 months (range 2.5-52.4), seven patients had died (23%) and 63% had a good outcome [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-3]. Anemia was associated with poor prognosis (p = 0.021), whereas development of critical illness did not impact mortality and functional outcome. We confirmed the need for ICU care in a subgroup of patients and the prevailing objective is improved seizure control, and definite diagnosis of AE and anemia were identified as risk factors for development of critical illness. However, prognosis was not affected by ICU admission.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 21 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 33%
Neuroscience 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 20 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2017.
All research outputs
#17,242,285
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#20,133
of 31,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,406
of 326,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#308
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.