↓ Skip to main content

Pattern Recognition Receptors and Autophagy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pattern Recognition Receptors and Autophagy
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00300
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ji Eun Oh, Heung Kyu Lee

Abstract

The immune system senses exogenous threats or endogenous stress through specialized machinery known as pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). These receptors recognize conserved molecular structures and initiate downstream signaling pathways to control immune responses. Although various immunologic pathways mediated by PRRs have been described, recent studies have demonstrated a link between PRRs and autophagy. Autophagy is a specialized biological process involved in maintaining homeostasis through the degradation of long-lived cellular proteins and organelles. In addition to this fundamental function, autophagy plays important roles in various immunologic processes. In this review, we focus on the reciprocal influences of PRRs and autophagy in modulating innate immune responses.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 86 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 23%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 32%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#24,737
of 31,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,071
of 242,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#105
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.