↓ Skip to main content

Fourier transform mid infrared spectroscopy applications for monitoring the structural plasticity of plant cell walls

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fourier transform mid infrared spectroscopy applications for monitoring the structural plasticity of plant cell walls
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asier Largo-Gosens, Mabel Hernández-Altamirano, Laura García-Calvo, Ana Alonso-Simón, Jesús Álvarez, José L. Acebes

Abstract

Fourier transform mid-infrared (FT-MIR) spectroscopy has been extensively used as a potent, fast and non-destructive procedure for analyzing cell wall architectures, with the capacity to provide abundant information about their polymers, functional groups, and in muro entanglement. In conjunction with multivariate analyses, this method has proved to be a valuable tool for tracking alterations in cell walls. The present review examines recent progress in the use of FT-MIR spectroscopy to monitor cell wall changes occurring in muro as a result of various factors, such as growth and development processes, genetic modifications, exposition or habituation to cellulose biosynthesis inhibitors and responses to other abiotic or biotic stresses, as well as its biotechnological applications.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 16%
Chemistry 5 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Chemical Engineering 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2014.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#14,359
of 24,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,858
of 241,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#75
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.