Title |
Seeing what you want to see: priors for one's own actions represent exaggerated expectations of success
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00232 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Noham Wolpe, Daniel M. Wolpert, James B. Rowe |
Abstract |
People perceive the consequences of their own actions differently to how they perceive other sensory events. A large body of psychology research has shown that people also consistently overrate their own performance relative to others, yet little is known about how these "illusions of superiority" are normally maintained. Here we examined the visual perception of the sensory consequences of self-generated and observed goal-directed actions. Across a series of visuomotor tasks, we found that the perception of the sensory consequences of one's own actions is more biased toward success relative to the perception of observed actions. Using Bayesian models, we show that this bias could be explained by priors that represent exaggerated predictions of success. The degree of exaggeration of priors was unaffected by learning, but was correlated with individual differences in trait optimism. In contrast, when observing these actions, priors represented more accurate predictions of the actual performance. The results suggest that the brain internally represents optimistic predictions for one's own actions. Such exaggerated predictions bind the sensory consequences of our own actions with our intended goal, explaining how it is that when acting we tend to see what we want to see. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Finland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
Poland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 113 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 26% |
Researcher | 26 | 21% |
Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 19 | 16% |
Unknown | 9 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 47 | 39% |
Neuroscience | 23 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 6 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 13% |
Unknown | 15 | 12% |