The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
TAXONOMIC REVISIONS IN THE GENUS ARCTOSTAPHYLOS (ERICACEAE)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Madroño, April 2007
|
DOI | 10.3120/0024-9637(2007)54[148:tritga]2.0.co;2 |
Authors |
V. Thomas Parker, Michael C. Vasey, Jon E. Keeley |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 21% |
Unknown | 11 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 29% |
Other | 2 | 14% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 71% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 14% |
Chemistry | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Madroño
#24
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,421
of 91,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Madroño
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them