Title |
Interaction and self-correction
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00798 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Glenda L Satne |
Abstract |
In this paper, I address the question of how to account for the normative dimension involved in conceptual competence in a naturalistic framework. First, I present what I call the naturalist challenge (NC), referring to both the phylogenetic and ontogenetic dimensions of conceptual possession and acquisition. I then criticize two models that have been dominant in thinking about conceptual competence, the interpretationist and the causalist models. Both fail to meet NC, by failing to account for the abilities involved in conceptual self-correction. I then offer an alternative account of self-correction that I develop with the help of the interactionist theory of mutual understanding arising from recent developments in phenomenology and developmental psychology. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 7% |
Germany | 1 | 7% |
South Africa | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
Student > Master | 3 | 21% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 14% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philosophy | 4 | 29% |
Psychology | 4 | 29% |
Mathematics | 1 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |