↓ Skip to main content

Decision-making in stimulant and opiate addicts in protracted abstinence: evidence from computational modeling with pure users

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decision-making in stimulant and opiate addicts in protracted abstinence: evidence from computational modeling with pure users
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00849
Pubmed ID
Authors

Woo-Young Ahn, Georgi Vasilev, Sung-Ha Lee, Jerome R. Busemeyer, John K. Kruschke, Antoine Bechara, Jasmin Vassileva

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 180 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 80 43%
Neuroscience 13 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Engineering 7 4%
Computer Science 5 3%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 52 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#15,076,991
of 26,442,002 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#13,537
of 35,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,902
of 243,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#199
of 386 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,442,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 386 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.