↓ Skip to main content

An anatomical and functional topography of human auditory cortical areas

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
347 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An anatomical and functional topography of human auditory cortical areas
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2014.00225
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Moerel, Federico De Martino, Elia Formisano

Abstract

While advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughout the last decades have enabled the detailed anatomical and functional inspection of the human brain non-invasively, to date there is no consensus regarding the precise subdivision and topography of the areas forming the human auditory cortex. Here, we propose a topography of the human auditory areas based on insights on the anatomical and functional properties of human auditory areas as revealed by studies of cyto- and myelo-architecture and fMRI investigations at ultra-high magnetic field (7 Tesla). Importantly, we illustrate that-whereas a group-based approach to analyze functional (tonotopic) maps is appropriate to highlight the main tonotopic axis-the examination of tonotopic maps at single subject level is required to detail the topography of primary and non-primary areas that may be more variable across subjects. Furthermore, we show that considering multiple maps indicative of anatomical (i.e., myelination) as well as of functional properties (e.g., broadness of frequency tuning) is helpful in identifying auditory cortical areas in individual human brains. We propose and discuss a topography of areas that is consistent with old and recent anatomical post-mortem characterizations of the human auditory cortex and that may serve as a working model for neuroscience studies of auditory functions.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 347 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 331 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 24%
Researcher 57 16%
Student > Master 42 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 64 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 99 29%
Psychology 54 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 5%
Engineering 13 4%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 100 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2024.
All research outputs
#4,847,074
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,670
of 11,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,736
of 240,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#24
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.