↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Neutrophil Function during Hemodialysis Treatment in Healthy Dogs under Anesthesia with Sevoflurane

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of Neutrophil Function during Hemodialysis Treatment in Healthy Dogs under Anesthesia with Sevoflurane
Published in
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, August 2014
DOI 10.1292/jvms.13-0541
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shunsuke SHIMAMURA, Ken KIMURA, Masaaki KATAYAMA, Tadahisa MASHITA, Kenichi MAEDA, Saori KOBAYASHI, SATO Reeko, Jun YASUDA

Abstract

This study evaluated the number and function of neutrophils during 3 hr of hemodialysis in healthy dogs under anesthesia. Isolated neutrophils were used to assess neutrophil adhesion, phagocytosis and the oxidative burst. At 0.5 and 3 hr after the start of hemodialysis treatment, there was a decrease in neutrophil number. The phagocytic ability of neutrophils was decreased 3 hr after the start of hemodialysis. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that hemodialysis reduces the number and phagocytic ability of neutrophils during treatment. However, these changes recover within 24 hr of hemodialysis.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Librarian 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,593,934
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#1,631
of 3,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,455
of 249,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#16
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,595 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.