The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006714.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Patricia A. Lohr, Jennifer L Hayes, Kristina Gemzell‐Danielsson |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 176 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 14% |
Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
Other | 30 | 17% |
Unknown | 56 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
Psychology | 7 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Other | 17 | 10% |
Unknown | 64 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,692,783
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,603
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,693
of 172,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.