↓ Skip to main content

Intestinal Epithelium in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intestinal Epithelium in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2014.00024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehmet Coskun

Abstract

The intestinal epithelium has a strategic position as a protective physical barrier to luminal microbiota and actively contributes to the mucosal immune system. This barrier is mainly formed by a monolayer of specialized intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) that are crucial in maintaining intestinal homeostasis. Therefore, dysregulation within the epithelial layer can increase intestinal permeability, lead to abnormalities in interactions between IECs and immune cells in underlying lamina propria, and disturb the intestinal immune homeostasis, all of which are linked to the clinical disease course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Understanding the role of the intestinal epithelium in IBD pathogenesis might contribute to an improved knowledge of the inflammatory processes and the identification of potential therapeutic targets.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 330 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 18%
Student > Master 59 18%
Student > Bachelor 42 13%
Researcher 40 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 85 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 59 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 3%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 100 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,529,038
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,166
of 5,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,037
of 235,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.