Title |
Impact of Amorphous SiO2 Nanoparticles on a Living Organism: Morphological, Behavioral, and Molecular Biology Implications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2014.00037 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alfredo Ambrosone, Maria Rosaria Scotto di Vettimo, Maria Ada Malvindi, Modi Roopin, Oren Levy, Valentina Marchesano, Pier Paolo Pompa, Claudia Tortiglione, Angela Tino |
Abstract |
It is generally accepted that silica (SiO2) is not toxic. But the increasing use of silica nanoparticles (SiO2NPs) in many different industrial fields has prompted the careful investigation of their toxicity in biological systems. In this report, we describe the effects elicited by SiO2NPs on animal and cell physiology. Stable and monodisperse amorphous silica nanoparticles, 25 nM in diameter, were administered to living Hydra vulgaris (Cnidaria). The dose-related effects were defined by morphological and behavioral assays. The results revealed an all-or-nothing lethal toxicity with a rather high threshold (35 nM NPs) and a LT50 of 38 h. At sub lethal doses, the morphophysiological effects included: animal morphology alterations, paralysis of the gastric region, disorganization and depletion of tentacle specialized cells, increase of apoptotic and collapsed cells, and reduction of the epithelial cell proliferation rate. Transcriptome analysis (RNAseq) revealed 45 differentially expressed genes, mostly involved in stress response and cuticle renovation. Our results show that Hydra reacts to SiO2NPs, is able to rebalance the animal homeostasis up to a relatively high doses of SiO2NPs, and that the physiological modifications are transduced to gene expression modulation. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
Researcher | 6 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 17% |
Unknown | 9 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 6 | 15% |
Engineering | 5 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
Chemistry | 3 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 17% |
Unknown | 12 | 29% |