↓ Skip to main content

Gene expression in whole lung and pulmonary macrophages reflects the dynamic pathology associated with airway surface dehydration

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gene expression in whole lung and pulmonary macrophages reflects the dynamic pathology associated with airway surface dehydration
Published in
BMC Genomics, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-726
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yogesh Saini, Hong Dang, Alessandra Livraghi-Butrico, Elizabeth J Kelly, Lisa C Jones, Wanda K O’Neal, Richard C Boucher

Abstract

Defects in airway mucosal defense, including decreased mucus clearance, contribute to the pathogenesis of human chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Scnn1b-Tg mice, which exhibit chronic airway surface dehydration from birth, can be used as a model to study the pathogenesis of muco-obstructive lung disease across developmental stages. To identify molecular signatures associated with obstructive lung disease in this model, gene expression analyses were performed on whole lung and purified lung macrophages collected from Scnn1b-Tg and wild-type (WT) littermates at four pathologically relevant time points. Macrophage gene expression at 6 weeks was evaluated in mice from a germ-free environment to understand the contribution of microbes to disease development.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Engineering 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2020.
All research outputs
#15,983,785
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,064
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,694
of 250,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#139
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.