The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The choice of statistical methods for comparisons of dosimetric data in radiotherapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Radiation Oncology, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-717x-9-205 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Abdulhamid Chaikh, Jean-Yves Giraud, Emmanuel Perrin, Jean-Pierre Bresciani, Jacques Balosso |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 2 | 2% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 100 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
Other | 15 | 14% |
Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
Researcher | 11 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Other | 20 | 19% |
Unknown | 21 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 32 | 31% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 21% |
Engineering | 6 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Unknown | 27 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2014.
All research outputs
#13,412,618
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#649
of 2,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,520
of 249,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#15
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,050 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.