The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bartonella quintana and Typhus Group Rickettsiae Exposure among Homeless Persons, Bogotá, Colombia - Volume 23, Number 11—November 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
|
---|---|
Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.3201/eid2311.170341 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Álvaro A. Faccini-Martínez, Andrea C. Márquez, Diana M. Bravo-Estupiñan, Omar-Javier Calixto, Christian A. López-Castillo, Carlos A. Botero-García, Marylin Hidalgo, Claudia Cuervo |
Abstract |
In 2015, we investigated Bartonella quintana and typhus group rickettsiae in body lice from homeless persons in Bogotá, Colombia. We found B. quintana-infected body lice and seroprevalence of this microorganism in 19% of homeless persons and typhus group rickettsiae in 56%. Public health professionals should start preemptive measures and active vector control. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 18% |
Colombia | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Researcher | 4 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Other | 9 | 19% |
Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 20 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,500,516
of 26,423,535 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#4,397
of 9,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,814
of 345,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#81
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,423,535 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.