↓ Skip to main content

Randomized Controlled Caregiver Mediated Joint Engagement Intervention for Toddlers with Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
544 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
602 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomized Controlled Caregiver Mediated Joint Engagement Intervention for Toddlers with Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10803-010-0955-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Connie Kasari, Amanda C. Gulsrud, Connie Wong, Susan Kwon, Jill Locke

Abstract

This study aimed to determine if a joint attention intervention would result in greater joint engagement between caregivers and toddlers with autism. The intervention consisted of 24 caregiver-mediated sessions with follow-up 1 year later. Compared to caregivers and toddlers randomized to the waitlist control group the immediate treatment (IT) group made significant improvements in targeted areas of joint engagement. The IT group demonstrated significant improvements with medium to large effect sizes in their responsiveness to joint attention and their diversity of functional play acts after the intervention with maintenance of these skills 1 year post-intervention. These are among the first randomized controlled data to suggest that short-term parent-mediated interventions can have important effects on core impairments in toddlers with autism. Clinical Trials #: NCT00065910.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 602 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 591 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 18%
Student > Master 90 15%
Student > Bachelor 63 10%
Researcher 61 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 7%
Other 103 17%
Unknown 134 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 199 33%
Social Sciences 75 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 6%
Linguistics 10 2%
Other 68 11%
Unknown 160 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,448,357
of 26,187,546 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#541
of 5,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,127
of 176,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#6
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,187,546 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.