The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Centre‐based day care for children younger than five years of age in low‐ and middle‐income countries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010543.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Taylor W Brown, Felix C van Urk, Rebecca Waller, Evan Mayo‐Wilson |
Abstract |
Because of poverty, children and families in low- and middle-income countries often face significant impediments to health and well-being. Centre-based day care services may influence the development of children and the economic situation of parents by providing good quality early childhood care and by freeing parents to participate in the labour force. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 391 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 386 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 58 | 15% |
Researcher | 48 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 34 | 9% |
Unspecified | 23 | 6% |
Other | 80 | 20% |
Unknown | 100 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 40 | 10% |
Psychology | 34 | 9% |
Unspecified | 15 | 4% |
Other | 70 | 18% |
Unknown | 114 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,047,765
of 26,086,865 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,223
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,170
of 264,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#171
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,086,865 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.